Rupert Grint’s Ron Weasley gamely bucks a class system that exists even in a magic school and looks to exploit talents he does possess to maximum effect.
She makes scholarly ambition and determination admirable virtues, even if these don’t always go down well with fellow students. Daniel Radcliffe plays the Oliver Twist-like Harry with an unaffected, intelligent approach that maintains his wide-eyed wonder yet grounds Harry in a realistic sense of loyalty and honor.Ī beautiful young girl named Emma Watson nails precocious Hermoine Granger. The young actors in the major roles all but pop out of Rowling’s pages. (After all, who wouldn’t want to go to this school?) Adapted by Steve Kloves and directed by Chris Columbus, the story remains a child’s fantasy version of a British boarding school, where young heroes and a spunky heroine battle not only against the forces of evil but, more importantly, study hard enough to continue next year. But the money is well spent: It has established Harry Potter’s cinematic credibility. It cost a reported $126 million to give substance to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, with its floating staircases and owl mail-delivery system. Clearly, the sky’s the limit, not only for worldwide box office but video, DVD, television and merchandising.
Rowling’s series of children’s adventure books.
Fortunately, all hands involved in the production have faithfully observed the mantra, “It’s the book, stupid.” Taking only a few shortcuts and hewing as close to the spirit of a literary work as any movie can, Harry Potter vividly imagines the world of wizards, magic school and mystical creatures found in J.K.
0 kommentar(er)
